So I was actually pondering on life...
The Kardashians. Is the fact of being famous despite having no talent, a talent itself? Can we therefore refer to it as "the Kardashian paradox"?
Question about life
-
- English
- International
- Drama
- Kardashian
Attention! We are receiving reports about SCAM attempts, which promise you to get Elcoin for free after submitting your account data on some pages.
We advise you DO NOT TO CLICK on such suspicious links and do not share your account login/password with ANYONE.
Please report any kind of such activity directly to our Support. Thank you!
We advise you DO NOT TO CLICK on such suspicious links and do not share your account login/password with ANYONE.
Please report any kind of such activity directly to our Support. Thank you!
-
Is desire the mark of our imperfection?
-
Is the fact of being famous despite having no talent, a talent itself?
Depends on your definition. If you use it as an analogy to skill, no, but if you define it in terms of attractiveness, which according to Wiktionary some do, then you could make the case.
Okay, that was easy mode. Now to philosophy.
Is desire the mark of our imperfection?
I wouldn't say that. Desire can be a force for both "good" and "evil", it can be constructive and destructive. Many people use the word with a negative connotation, not noticing that in itself desire is of little meaning at all.
-
For one, how do you define attractiveness? Also, you worded the question the other way around. Let me illustrate this by means of a simple word substitution. "Is the fact of being famous despite having no attractiveness, attractiveness itself?" With some people being attracted to fame itself, I think the answer to this question is trivial.
By the way, you're implying talented people get famous, but a lot of them actually die without being noticed even just by their senpais. If you had an awesome skill, but no one was there to judge you, would it be a talent?
-
I call it Kardashian paradox
-
Because you can’t see what is behind it
-
I just came to realize, that without an objective standard for attractiveness (which itself likely doesn't exist), this question becomes significantly harder, as we would have to weigh two unquantifiable amounts of attractiveness against each other to reach a scientific conclusion. While we can point out, that some people would find them more attractive, we would also have to find a way to measure the lack of attraction despite fame. I don't think, it is paradoxical, though, but we can refer to that problem as Kardashian's question (unless others discovered it earlier).
Because you can’t see what is behind it
In relation to desires or in relation to Kardashian's question?
-
Venderò mai scarpe e gravitoni hero eve?
-
Kardashian’s
-
> Question about life
> Kardashian
> Return to thread list.
-
> Question about life
> Kardashian
> Return to thread list.
Better go AW
-
Return to thread list.
But how do you post then?
-
Return to thread list.
But how do you post then?
Telepath, use your brain
-
Return to thread list.
But how do you post then?
With my hands.
-
Regardless of whether you do it via telepathy or not, you're technically not leaving the thread.
-
You can open the thread on different tabs, then close one
-
Regardless of whether you do it via telepathy or not, you're technically not leaving the thread.
Great senses.
I indeed didn't left the thread.
-
Then you're still not returning to the thread list, because by switching back to the tab with the thread, you're here again in an unreturned state. Especially in browsers which have a one thread/process per tab behaviour.
-
You're.. beautiful
